Saturday, March 12, 2011

Abortion


Abortion has been one of this country's most controversial topic on
hand. But if one sees the constitutional infringement to women by the
restriction of abortion, the torment to the unwanted child and the anguish
society has to sustain,then this topic would not be so debatable.  Too many
people do not see the cause and effect of not being able to have abortions.

    All human beings are given some inalienable right guaranteed by the
Constitution.  One of those privilege is the right to pursue happiness.  A
baby can sometimes disrupt a woman's pursuit of happiness.  Even if she
decides to give it up for adoption, she still has the burden of carrying
the fetus for nine months.  Having the option to perform an abortion can
solve that obstacle.  Taking away this right would be invading on a woman's
constitutional liberty.

    The unwanted child also suffers.  Most of the time the mother of the
unwanted child is very young and inexperienced or too poor to take care of
the child.  The child is usually malnourished, has no medical care, and
gets very little attention or love.  The foster care system isn't any
better.  Only a small percentage of the children are adopted by suitable
parents.  But the rest remain in the foster care system, where there is
little or no personal care.   In both cases, the child has a poor education
because of the lack of attention and discipline. He grows up to be
unproductive individual or a menace to society.  Many get involved in drugs
and crimes.  These individuals are also very violent, lacking morality due
small amount of care they received themselves. In the long run, not only
does the child suffer but also society, who has to tolerate his violent
behavior and crimes.

    An abortion can be seen as putting the child out of misery while he
doesn't have the ability to reason or fear.

    In short, abortion allows a woman to retain her constitutional rights,
it relieves a would be suffering child out of his distress and it
establishes a safer and more peaceful society.  On these grounds, abortion
should be kept legal, and even encouraged to specific individuals, for
benefits to all of us.

A Woman's Identity


Women lose their identity as soon as they get married and
begin a family.  Every little girl dreams of getting married and
raising a family, because this is what women are taught to seek
at an early age.  When a woman achieves this goal, she loses her
identity due to the many roles that she is now forced to play.
Once married, a woman is expected to be a mother, nurturer,
housekeeper, teacher, doctor, cook, chauffeur, and more
increasingly, a career woman.  Women are forced to carry out
these roles because of society's traditional view of the role
women should play, and young women are pressured to follow in
their mother's footsteps.  Because a woman's life revolves around
her children and husband, her responsibilities are never far from
thought.  Consequently, women lose their identity because they
are so caught up in being a wife and mother that they no longer
have time to pursue their own desires and goals. 
 
      Women are increasingly becoming career women, while raising
a family at the same time.  Despite the fact that women have the
job of raising their family, many women also have full time
careers because the extra income is often needed in the family.
Some men criticize women for trying to act too much like men, but
women are being forced by society to move between the traditional
definitions of male and female roles, because of the many
different tasks they have to carry out from day to day.  For
example, in order for women to enter the "male" world of work,
they have to obtain "masculine" traits and leave their "feminine"
traits at home.  
 
      Bearing children is expected in today's society, because


nurturing and child care are viewed as feminine traits.  Women
are conditioned at a young age to believe that once they are
adults they will become mothers.  If a middle aged, married woman
doesn't have any children, people often assume that there is a
biological reason for her lack of children.  Motherhood is
expected by society, but contrary to popular belief, many
psychologists believe that it is not instinct, but a learned
desire.  In Betty Rollin's essay, "Motherhood: Who Needs It," one
psychiatrist explains that, "women don't need to be mothers any
more than they need spaghetti."  Once a woman has children her
life becomes an extension of her children's life.  She has to
provide for and take care of her children and she can no longer
put herself first, because she is expected to always have her
family's best interests in mind.  

      Most women, if posed with the question, "Are you happy?"
will say that they are, but after some soul searching it is
evident that on the surface they appear to be, while on the
inside they are unhappy and often feel suffocated.  It isn't
until things in life are going poorly, that women let themselves
realize that they have feelings.  Women have lost touch with who
they are and are many times running away from their feelings,
because they have been busy masking themselves in order to
maintain their family.  

      Women are imprisoned by the many roles they have to play,
but it is essentially self-imposed.  Although, this imprisonment
wouldn't be self-imposed, if it weren't for society's pressure on
women to fit into the traditional female mold.  Due to these
expectations that are placed on women, eventually a woman who is
married and has children, will become only a empty and hollow
image of a mother and wife, instead of a living and breathing
person with feelings and a mind of her own.

A Time of Prosperous Change


In the early nineteen hundreds when women used to be treated as objects who were only good for cooking and cleaning. These women were expected to stay home and do nothing but take care of the children. Authors were rarely women .Now in the present day a women is thought of as having a mind of her own. She is thought of as a independent, an individual who has a peace of mind of her own who is allowed to work and make a living as she pleases. Even we don't think of Weldon every time someone mentions a popular contemporary author we know she deserves to be mentioned. Both in  the Critical Survey of Long Fiction  and in  Love and Marriage in the Novels of Anita Brookner and Fay Weldon  Weldon  is mentioned with great honor and respect. Anna Ericson uses more past situations in Fay Weldon's own life while contrasting her to Anita Brookner while in contrast the Critical Survey of Long Fiction  criticizes the works without much comparison to others. Both the Magill  and Anna Ericson have strong points on a women's individualism but Anna Ericson proves Weldon's choice of personality for the main character was one reflecting Weldon's  own thoughts and morals.

In the The Life and Loves of a She Devil Ruth is a character who is well developed who one can feel one with because of the fact that  the author creates great depth to her as a character. In the  Critical Survey of Long Fiction the author states that "In her fiction,
                                               
Fay Weldon explores women's lives with wit and humor. She is caustic in her implicit condemnation of injustice but avoids preaching by characters say and what they do"(Magill 3474). On the other hand Ericson has more of a formula to Weldon's novels unlike the Critical Survey of Long Fiction. "The Weldon narrator is usually omniscient; she is wise, sad and cynical"(Ericson 1). which shows that  the characters must be well developed to have such a personified personality. Magill  rarely states how Ruth's personality had come about  in  The Life and Loves of a She Devil.

Love was not an issue to Weldon when writing this novel this may be due to the lack of love in her very own life. Love was never thought of importance in  the Critical Survey of Long Fiction. On  the other hand in Love and Marriage in the Novels of Anita Brookner and Fay Weldon   Ericson uses the subject of lack of love as the focus of his theories and that Weldon was a unwed mother  who had to deal with the pressures of having a child instead of receiving love from his father. Even though Weldon wed eventually she later learned of what love was which gave her the experience to right about such a unloved character. Magill on the other hand focuses on their married relationship rather that the lack of love from Ruth and Bobo's relationship " The plot tells the story of a middle-class, suburban housewife, Ruth......."(Magill 3474).

Weldon always makes the heroine hidden or makes her in hiding so the reader has to figure out for themselves which is being done. Ericson states "The general Weldon heroine is not so easily described"(Ericson 2).  In The Life and Loves of a She Devil 
Weldon uses great technique to make her main character Ruth go in hiding she makes her hide not only her motives and desires but herself.
                                               
The author uses great technique in making the reader choose for themselves if the main character is the antagonist of protagonist. In The Life and Loves of a She Devil Weldon makes Ruth out to be a helpless women who firsts depends on her husband Bobbo for everything but in a underhanded manner she steals her husbands money and gets him to be charged with embezzlement "But all the time he was planning his great flight, the new life, with someone altogether different, and on his client's money, too."(Weldon 226). 

The author goes to great distances to make Ruth's personality change in drastic manners. Ruth went from one extreme to another she was once dependent, and unsatisfied  and later became dependent and satisfied by her husband's lack of composure. Ruth changed just as if times were changing from the early 1900's to the later 1900's. Weldon writes that:
      "It seemed to Ruth that at last the times had come to return to the High Tower. She could walk with ease, even run a little. She could life a two-pound weight in either hand. Her circulatory problems were under control. She no longer needed the Hermione Clinic. She no longer needed anyone. She danced with Mr.Ghengis in the dew of the morning, as the sun rose red and round over the escarpment, and with every step it was as if she trod on knives; but she thanked him for giving her life and told him she was going."(239).
In both Criticisms the authors use reasoning to justify the use a almost happy ending to the novel. Ericson states "Strangely enough, I have yet to read a Fay Weldon novel without an almost unbelievably happy ending. Still , the happy ending is usually based on coincidence, fate or supernatural occurrences,. And practically never on the
                                               
 actions of the characters" (Ericson 3474). But on the other hand in The Life and Loves of a She Devil the author makes the main character achieve whatever is achieved by herself.
Also in the Critical Survey of Long Fiction the author sums up the ending as so "Ruth is in command, while Bobbo has been humiliated and accepts his fate like owntrodden wife"(Ericson 3476).
      Both criticisms are unique in a way of their own. But I feel as if Ericson does a better point of proving how Weldon's life plays a major role in the development in her characters. Even though the author of  Critical Survey of Long Fiction doesn't establish this he still has done a very concise job of stating his views. The Life and Loves of a She Devil is a very good novel showing the dramatic change of time contrasting with the life of Ruth the main character in The Life and Loves of a She Devil .
           
Work Cited
Ericson, Anna. Love and Marriage in the Novels of Anita Brookner and Fay Weldon.    
      World Wide Web, The Internet. January 14 1997
Magill, N. Frank, ed. Critical Survey of Long Fiction. Pasedena: UP of California, 1991.
      Vol. 8 of English Language Series 8 vols. 1969-1994
Weldon, Fay. The Life and Loves of a She Devil. London: Coronet, 1983.

A Comparison of the Status of Women in Classical Athens and Early Christianity


Since the beginning of time the treatment of women has improved dramatically.  In the earliest of times women were mere slaves to men.  Today women are near equals in almost all fields.  In 411 B.C., when Lysistrata was written, men had many stunning advantages to that of their female counterparts.  Although women's rights between 30 and 100 A.D., the time of the New Testament, were still not what they are today, the treatment of women was far better. Overall, the equality of women in the New Testament exceeds that of the women in Lysistrata in three major ways:  physical mobility, society's view of women's nature, and women's public legal rights.
      Albeit in Lysistrata the women were shown as revolutionaries rising up against the men, women in classical Greece were never like that.  Aristophanes created the play as a comedy, showing how the world might be in the times of the Peloponesian war if women tried to do something.  It was the women's job to stay home and tend to the house, and never leave, unlike they did in the play, the women were shown as revolutionaries rising up against the men, women in classical Greece were never like that.
 

      The activities of women in Classical Athens were confined to "bearing children, spinning and weaving, and maybe managing the domestic arrangements. No wandering in the beautiful streets for them."   The suppression of women went so far as to divide the house into separate areas for males and females.  While the women stayed home, the men were usually out fighting, and when they weren't fighting, they were entertaining their friends and having sexual favors performed by courtesans. 
      The rights of women in early Christianity were a far cry from today, although they were much better off than their Athenian counterparts.  In the Christian church, women were treated as equals.  The first evidence of this is when the woman with hemorrhages touches Jesus' clothing and he says that her faith has made her well (Mark 5:34).  This shows that both sexes are treated equally in that eyes of god even though at this time the hemorrhages that the woman was having was a symbol of uncleanness, and that good things can happen to both if they have enough "faith." 
      The rights of women are also extended in the New Testament when the rights of husband and wife are shown as equals.  It is stated that each should show affection to their partner, and that each partner controls their mate's body (I Corinthians 7:3-4).  This shows that each person should be equal in the marriage, unlike in Lysistrata where the man did whatever he wanted to whomever he wanted while the woman slaved at home .
      Women were also considered to be more "enpowered" in the times of the New Testament.  This is displayed when the women nearly monopolize the practice of speaking in tongues, or even speaking at all (I Corinthians 14:36).  Speaking in tongues was thought to be much like talking from the angels, which was considered to special talent.
      Overall the women of early Christianity had a better quality of life than those in classical Athens.  They were not only allowed to leave the house more, but they were also treated more as equals in society's view of women, and their public rights.

12 Angry Men


A persons surroundings can influence him. In "12 Angry Men" by Reginald Rose a young mans

life is held by twelve men with contrasing views. Eight a caring man, who wishes to talk about why the

other jurors think that the boy is guilty, clashes with Three, a sadistic man who would pull the swith

himselfto end the boys life. Accroding to Rose, several elements can infulence a jury's verdict, such as the

emotional make-up of individual jurors.


      Many elements can change a jurors decision. Juror Three, who is convincd that the boy is guilty,

is allied with Four who is eventually convicedEights showing of how the two testimonies given by the old

woman and old man are lies, votes guilty. Three outraged by this exclames "A guilty man's gonna be

walking the streets... he's got to die! Stay with me." (23) But Four sees the truth that Eight has brought

into th light and still votes guilty. Eight tries to convince Three how the boy is not guilty beyond

reasonable doubt but Three does not listen adn would rather see the boy die. "For this kid, you bet I'd pull

the switch."(17) This shows how emotionally unstable Three is. He is a grown man living in a civilized

community and would like to see a boy who he does not even know die by his own hands Eight does not

think highly of Three for what he says about killing the boy and shouts "your a sadist."(17) which is the

absolute truth about Three.


      The emotional make-up of a juror can change his desicision on wther or not to let a man live or

die. When someone is asked judge someone else, shoud not you look at al the facts to be sure beyond a

shoadow of a doubt that the man who cimmitted the crime is guilty? Yes, a juror should look at all the

facts but some do not, they just judge the person on how that person feels.